Friday, May 24, 2013

10 Essential Rules for the Aspiring Audiophile


A note of thanks and appreciation to the following: my uncle Su Lim who first started me on this hi-fi journey; my audiophile mentors Kuo YH, Ashley Elias, Sim TS, and Gabriel of Zenn Audio; and last but not least, the members of the group RFSG Vinyl, who have rekindled my passion for good music, and made me rediscover how fun this hobby can be - thanks guys!

The following are some basic rules that I didn't have the luxury of knowing when I started out on this hobby. After lots of painful trial and error, I think I finally have some of it figured out. 
Hopefully, some day I'd understand 'em all and achieve audiophilic nirvana, and maybe then I can finally stop buying audiophile grade CDs....

Listening Room, circa Jan 2008












1. Optimise the listening room.
If you have the luxury of a dedicated room, good for you! Most of the rest of us have to make do with a room that doubles up as the AV room, bedroom, study, living hall etc. Even then, it’s possible to optimise the room from an acoustic point of view.
Firstly, the room has to be balanced between acoustically live and acoustically dead. The average real-life room with lots of furniture, junk and gear should be fine, but beware of large swaths of glass or bare wall or floor - if you can discern echoes from hand-claps while walking about the room, it won’t hurt to lay down a rug or two, or a set of curtains.
Next, the speakers need to be positioned correctly – here there’s lots of resources online – the Cardas golden-ratio method, the Rule of Thirds etc. – so you’re welcome to explore and experiment, but do note that a correctly positioned pair of speakers will likely to be far out enough from the wall to incur (gasp!) The Disapproval Of The Wife, so be-warned.
Most people will place the rest of their audio or AV gear in the space between the speakers, but do note that this will negatively affect the speaker’s sound projection. Ditto for any piece of furniture (e.g. study desk or coffee table) between the speakers and you at your listening position.

If, and when, you get your listening room right, this is what should happen when you sit down at the listening position and close your eyes - the speakers, the whole system, should disappear sonically. With your eyes closed, you should not be able to discern where the speakers are - in front of you should just be a 'wall of sound'.
If, and when, you can achieve this - congratulations!

CEC ST930 turntable, Jelco SA250ST arm, Ortofon Rohmann cartridge, circa April 2013

2. Proportion the budget right.
This depends on how many sources of music you intend to play – obviously the more sources you want the more you’re going to have to spend. To keep this simple, let’s assume you just need one source, e.g. a turntable.
I would suggest a 3:3:3:1 split as a starting point, i.e. 30% of your budget for each of the source, amplification and speakers, leaving 10% for the rest (cables etc.).
There will obviously be much variability in this, but if you are eyeing a CD player costing twelve hundred bucks when your budget is two grand, then you might be in for a bit of a fix.

3. Find the love-of-your-life speakers.
The most important item to nail down right is the speakers. I cannot emphasize this point enough!
Just think of the speakers as your life partner. The same way you’d want to take your time to find the right life partner you truly love, you’d want to take your time to find the pair of speakers that you, your ears, and your heart truly love. Reviews and all can help, but at the end of the day, you’ve got to like, no, love how the speakers sound – you’re the one who’s going be listening to them day in day out, not anyone else.
So the same way you’d want to choose the girlfriend you wanna go out with, not the one your mother wants you to go out with; choose the speakers that you like, not the ones that the Stereophile reviewer likes.

Yugoslavian EI 6CA7s, Antique Sound Labs AQ1008 amps, circa Jan 2008

4. Match the amp to your speakers.
Once you’re found the speaker love of your life, then this next rule is easy – get the amp that best drives your chosen speaker. Do note that this might be easier said than done – getting a correct speaker-amplifier pairing can be a black art, but there are a few tricks....
The store where you bought your speakers – what amplification did they use to drive them?
When your speakers were designed, what was the amplification used? For example, Robin Marshall famously used Naim amplification when designing the Epos 14 speaker.
Go onto the forums – is there a particular pairing that many people seem to rave about?
Do note that good amplification often don’t come cheap, and cheap amplification often don’t sound good.
Lastly, just because the speaker and the amp share the same brand does not automatically make them an ideal pairing. Case in point – my Mission 751 speakers sound terrible with a Rotel integrated, pretty darn good with a Mission Cyrus amp, but exceedingly wonderful with an Audiolab 8000A!

Cyrus CDP, Audiolab 8000A, circa March 2013












5. Get the best source component that your budget allows.
You’d think this is an obvious no brainer, but what a lot of budding audiophiles tend to do is to overspend on fancy downstream gear, and then buying an entry-level source component.
As with most men’s toys, entry-level gear tends to get outgrown very quickly, thus it often makes more sense to go straight for mid-level gear right from the get-go.
Also, for the same quantum of money, it’s often more worthwhile buying used mid-level gear than new entry-level gear.

6. Don’t go overboard on accessories.
I’m going to stick my neck out here and boldly proclaim that if you follow the rules above and get the room, speaker, amp and source right, then accessories like cables and power cords etc. are going to matter much less - as in you won’t need to over-spend on hideously overpriced accessories and tweaks cos you’ve already got your basic components right.
The reverse is also true – if you’ve got your room acoustics wrong, or a poor source component, or a amp-speaker mismatch, then no amount of exotic cable upgrading, fancy tuning devices, power conditioners, tube socks, cleaning fluid, or green marker pens is going to right the fundamentally wrong sound.

7. Listen with your heart, not your ears.
The typical audiophile should be listening out for airy trebles, neutral midrange, tight bass, soundstage, detailing, micro-dynamics, PRAT etc. correct? My tip? Forget about all that!
Sit down, close your eyes, and just feel the music. Does it make you feel relaxed, or joyful, or as if you’re in a live performance? Do you feel an emotional connection to the music? Are you losing yourself in the song? Or does it make you tense, uneasy, wanting to get up and change the track?
If it’s the former, congratulations! If it’s the latter, time to go back - you’ve done something wrong somewhere (or you’ve used a non-audiophile approved disc! =P)
Also, it's important to make your judgement only after prolonged listening. A lot of hi-fi gear sounds great on first listen - be careful here - often these will tire you and your ears out on prolonged listening. But if you find that you can sit and listen to, and enjoy, the music over a prolonged session, then you're on to something.

David Ng, Mosaic Music Festival, March 2011
8. Listen to, and take reference from, live music.
Often, the audiophile will expect his speakers to reproduce tight bass – bass tighter than the botox-ed butt of that aging Hollywood star, but have you ever heard a plucked double bass in real life? A real life double bass doesn’t sound as ‘tight’ as your audiophile recording will have you believe. You don’t have to take my word – go have a listen for yourself!
So do go check out a classical concert, play a musical instrument, attend a live gig. Listen to, and learn, what real live music sounds like, and use that as a reference when tuning your hi-fi.

Collection, circa Jan 2013












9. Don’t limit your listening to just audiophile-approved recordings.
Just think – what percentage of recorded music has been recorded and released in an audiophile-approved format? 1%? 0.1% I don’t know, but you get my point – there’s a shitload of music out there that’s not pressed using Fancy Acronym Technology (FAT) on 188gm virgin vinyl using half speed mastering, and you’ll be missing out of all of that if you only listen to audiophile stuff.

10. Learn from your mistakes, and share on your experiences!
Lastly, in this audiophile journey, you’re going to make mistakes. Nobody’s going to get it all correct the first time.
You’re not going to believe the number of audiophile boo-boos I’ve committed and the amount of audiophile snake-oil I’ve fallen for - drinking by the label, buying entry level junk, wrong amp-speaker pairing, wrong speaker positioning - I’ve done ‘em all!
It’s ok - I was young and stupid then (now I’m just stupid). It’s called ‘school fees’ – we’ve all had to pay them one way or the other.
BUT we can learn from the mistakes of others! It’s in this spirit that I’ve penned this article…hopefully someone out there will read this and benefit from the folly of my audiophile ways.

Disclaimer.
I’ve been listening to hi-fi for many years, but that doesn’t make me an expert – the same way a lifetime of farting doesn't make anyone an authority on flatulence.
The above are my personal observations - you don’t have to agree with it, or even believe any of it.
If any of the above offends your own audiophile believes and inclinations – it’s ok, you don’t have to write in to complain – the world hasn’t ended and nobody's died - just close the page and move on to another Internet site – but thank you for reading this far anyway! =)

Michell Gyrodec turntable, Graham 1.5c tonearm, Ortofon Rohmann cartridge, circa Dec 2011

Friday, December 28, 2012

Four vintage Heuers, and a Zenith A384!

I thought this was too momentous an occasion not to celebrate with a post - the occasion of reaching my first five vintage watches!!!
(I used the birth of my son in 2010 as an excuse to start collecting watches from around my birth year, 1969, but I think it's just as much a sign of my mid-life crisis...)
The two Omegas, the Seamaster Cosmic and the pre-moon Speedmaster, were gone (but not forgotten), so I was left with these five vintage babies - three Autavias, a Monaco 1133G, and a Zenith El Primero A384 - could have done a lot worse, if I may say so myself!!!



What's next?
Well, for one, I'd like a 'Proof-Proof' JDM Seiko 5 Speedtimer with the 6139A movement dating to my birth year AND month, August 1969 - that'll be ultra cool.
Then there's another rare Zenith diver from that same era that I have my eye on, the A3736.
But from now on, it'll have to be on a strict one in one out policy....nobody realistically needs more than 5 watches, right? =P


Wednesday, October 31, 2012

1972 Heuer Autavia 1163GMT

Autavia 1163GMT, circa 1972












Alas, I never managed to bond emotionally with the Speedy - the severe black dial with the white hands did nothing for me..... so when the opportunity came about to trade the Speedy with an Autavia 1163GMT (thanks Wong!), who was I to refuse?
I've always wanted a GMT - the Pepsi dials just oozes retro cool, but (thankfully for my wallet) Rolexes never did it for me, so the Heuer 1163GMT just about perfectly fit the bill.



This 1972ish 'Mark III' 1163GMT always seemed to me a 'transitional' model - still having the older (but nicer IMO) case of the 1163, but already donning the 'non brushed metal' hands of the later 11630 variant.
Here's an interesting story of why the subdial hands were changed to black when they originally were red in colour -  shows how much these old companies listened to their customers back in those days...

This one, unfortunately, has an over-polished case, but it's got a complete makeover from Tag Heuer, and it's even supposed to be pressure tested, not that I've dared to go swimming with it...
Anyways, it was just too pretty to pass up, plus it was a straight trade with the Speedy - you just can't say no to that, can you?!

Heuer Autavia 1163GMT, circa 1972

1972 Heuer Chronosport catalog, courtesy of OnTheDash





















Oct 2013 addendum

As much I love my Autavia 1163GMT, the over-polished case has always bothered me.
So a couple of months ago, I sent it to the Belgian master to have the case refurbished, and it's just returned today, in all it's glory.
Just look at the sunburst brushed finish at the top of the case - as God and Heuer intended - just perfect!




Tuesday, September 4, 2012

1970 Heuer Monaco 1133G

Heuer Monaco 1133G, circa 1970












Next up was to be a Monaco. For the longest time, I had foolishly wondered what the fuss was about a square watch with a blue dial....then I saw a Monaco 73633G in the flesh, and I promptly fell in love....
But the Monaco 73633 was a manual winding model - I wanted the more valuable, automatic variant, the Monaco 1133, but these are supremely expensive.

It took a while to find a decent one within my budget, but when this one came on sale from a well-known Heuer collector from Denmark (thanks Peter!), I decided it was the one for me - a 1133G with, once again, a cal.11 movement, and again, dating to 1970.
The dial has some 'melt' around the edges, but the case has been beautifully restored by a certain Belgian master, and everything about it is just so...sweet.
I just love the way the metallic grey dial changes color and texture - from silver, to gun-metal grey, to almost black - depending on the lighting.

For an excellent and detailed writeup and review of the 1133G Monaco, see this Oct 2013 post in Hodinkee!





Dec 1969 Heuer ad

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

1970 Heuer Autavia 1163MH



After the 'warm-up' of the little Omega Seamaster I was ready to go for my first real vintage piece!
Due to Jeff Stein's excellent resource OnTheDash, there was a lot of information on vintage Heuers available - I decided I wanted an early Heuer Autavia 1163 with the cal.11, the world's first automatic chronograph movement.

I found this one in Nov 2011 - an early (pre-Viceroy) Heuer Autavia 1163MH from Italy, dating by serial number to 1970.
You can still see the original ad here (thank you Alberto!), and more information on the early automatic Autavias here, and a detailed write-up on their serial numbers here.



In the flesh, it is an impressively handsome watch - I've come across my fair share of watches since first encountering this 1163MH, but my initial impression still remains - it is almost perfectly proportioned - just the right size to look aggressive and sporty without being oversized, the black dial with the contrasting silver subdials wonderfully balanced by the red chrono sweep hand, all enclosed within the elegant MH bezel, and everything brought together by the timeless and classy original Gay Freres 'beads of rice' bracelet.

This was not my first vintage acquisition - that honour will always belong to the little Omega Seamaster 166.022 (that I eventually sold) - but this was the first one I knew was a definite keeper.

1970 Heuer Chronosport catalog, courtesy of OnTheDash

Sunday, August 19, 2012

Omega Seamaster Cosmic 166.022 - my first birth year watch


Perhaps inspired by Kaister's birth in 2010, in these past couple of years, I've been increasingly interested in things from my own birth year, 1969.
It started with trying to look for a birth year acoustic guitar, but these are hard to come by, and when they do, they're either in terrible condition, or are hideously expensive, or both.
Thus my focus gradually shifted to birth year watches - these were easier - mechanical watches tend to last longer than wooden guitars, and they also tend to be produced in greater numbers.
But my knowledge of vintage watches was literally nil - heck, I didn't even know the difference between automatic and manual winding, so I had to start from scratch.

The internet was the obvious place to begin, and Ebay has always been a long-time friend.
From there, searching for 1969 wristwatches led me to a bunch of Rolexes and Omegas. Rolex I couldn't afford, but the prices of these old Omegas seemed reasonable. The Speedmaster 'moon watch' was an obvious choice, but there were many many variants, and unravelling them all seemed very complicated and daunting.

Then I spotted a little Seamaster Cosmic. This was of course a Seamaster from a pre-James Bond era, but it was unusually shaped, had a pretty dial seemingly 'different' from the others (more on that later), and in rather good condition.
Plus it's serial number suggested a 1969 production. It's impossible to be totally accurate with these serial numbers, but a search of this model ST166.022 on the Omega website suggested a production period spanning 1967-1970, which tallies.
The seller actually took the trouble to post up loads of high quality pictures, pretty good by Ebay standards, and was friendly and responsive to my questions. So after a bit of back and forth with the guy, I took the plunge and pulled the trigger...and within a week, the postman showed up at the door with my first vintage birth year watch!!! Woohoo!!!

Measuring 33.5 mm across, it was surprisingly small in the flesh (online photos of watches are often taken with a macro lens, so everything looks larger than life - Vintage Watch Collecting lesson #1), and the unusual dial in relatively good condition very probably meant it's a serviced or refinished dial (lesson #2), but hey, it's a pretty little thing, and it'll always have a little place in my heart as my first birth year watch from 1969....but was it to be my last?

Stay tuned.....


Sunday, May 6, 2012

Hokkien Mee!!!




One of the proudest moments of my life...tonight I cooked my very own Hokkien Mee!!!
It's a dish that every Singaporean (and Malaysian) is familiar with...it's so well known, it's even got it's own Wikipedia page!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hokkien_mee

For those not in the know...let's just say that it's a bit more tricky to cook than say, spaghetti aglio olio.
So I've been looking forward to today for some time now...a mixture of enthusiastic anticipation and fearful worry that I might just shame myself embarrassingly.
But my fears proved to be unfounded...when I lifted the lid, I saw (and smelt) a steaming wok full of pungently fragrant, moist noodles...Lena and my dad had a taste and declared it 'Good!!', but I didn't believe them - they must be just being condescending....but when I ate my first mouthful...I had to concur - it was most definitely a big two thumbs up!!!

Many thanks for the help and encouragement from my darling wife Lena, and the invaluable tips from her dad (my father-in-law), who just might be the greatest male chef that no one's ever heard of!! =P

Next up, a local dish that's possibly even more tricky to master....Char Kuay Teow!!!!